| Aral Sea crisis | About IFAS | Projects & programs | News | |||||||
|
ASBP 1 |
||||||||||
|
In January, 1994, top authorities of Central Asia countries adopted The Programme of Actions for the nearest 3-5 years on improvement of environment situation in the Aral Sea Basin taking into account social and economic development of the region (basic directions) (ASBP-1). UNDP, UNEP, the World Bank, GEF, EBRD, ABRD, TASIS, German Fund, Kuwait Fund (EBRA), USAID and other international organizations together with experts and scientists from Central Asia countries took part in preparation of the Programme. The basic goals of the Programme were the following:
Measures in the framework of the Programme were divided into 2 stages. Duration of the preparatory stage was identified as 3- 5 years with financial support of 30 million $ USA. The period of 10-15 years were fixed for implementation of the second stage. The cost of the second stage were valued at 500-570 million $ USA. The Programme included eight components based on project concepts: Project 1.1 Regional Water Resources Management Strategy. Project 1.2 Sustainability of Dams and Reservoir Management. Project 2.1 Hydro meteorological Services. Project 2.2 Regional Environmental Information System. Project 3.1 Water Quality Management. Project 3.2 Uzbekistan Drainage. Project 4.1 Wetland Restoration. Project 4.2 Restoration of Northern Part of the Aral Sea. Project 4.3 Environmental Studies in the Aral Sea Basin. Project 4.4 Syr Darya Control and Delta Development Project. Project 5.1 Clean Water, Sanitation and Health Uzbekistan. Project 5.2 Clean Water, Sanitation and Health Turkmenistan. Project 5.3 Clean Water, Sanitation and Health Kazakhstan. Project 5.4 Medium-term Water Supply. Project 6 Integrated Land and Water Management in the Upper Watersheds. Project 7 Operational Water Resources Management. Project 8 Capacity Building. After implementation in 1997 of the basic part of actions of the preliminary stage, Central Asia countries and International organizations-donors of the Programme, conducted the joint review of the running state of Programme implementation and recommended the following actions to be implemented at the second stage:
At the same time, analysis of Programme implementation is evidence of the fact, that the basic limiting factor of foliature in complete implementation of a number of programmes and projects is not only lack of financing, but inadequate level of intersectional coordination and poor control of project implementation by IFAS executive bodies. |
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
Web Master: ecifas@tajik.net |
||||||||||